A Freezone Bible Supporter

Here is a complete Level 0 Academy pack from the 1970s
being posted in 11 parts.  Contents below following the
FZ Bible mission statement.

Much Love,

Tech Lover


**************************************************

FREEZONE BIBLE MISSION STATEMENT

Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.

The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.

They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be
stamped out as heritics.  By their standards, all Christians, 
Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered
to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.

The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.

We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.

But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,
the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old 
testament regardless of any Jewish opinion.  

We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.

We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.

Thank You,

The FZ Bible Association

**************************************************


******** LEVEL ZERO ACADEMY COURSE PACK ********

Level 0 Academy Course Packs (2) circa 1974 and 1976,
Almost identical [Ed Note: differences noted like this]

Dark blue soft cardboard cover 
8 1/2 by 14 inch 4 hole punched & held together by 
double retainer clips. As issued by Pubs US.

This is complete including book excerpts but does not include
the complete book "Self Analysis" which is also part of the
level (it was posted to the internet last year).

This does not include transcripts of the level 0 tapes, but
we are working on those and will post them eventually.

Note that in the 1970s, HCOBs not written by Ron were converted
to BTBs (Board Technical Bulletins), resulting in the freequent
"reissued as BTB" designation.

Note that bulletins have a "distribution" near the top stating
where they are to be used.  A common distribution is "remimeo"
which means that the orgs may run copies on their mimeo machines.
Another, older, designation is "CenOcon" which means "Central
Orgs Continental".  Others such as "D of T" (director of training)
refer to posts in the Scientology organization.


********

CONTENTS:

part 1

01. BPL   26 JAN 72R  SCIENTOLOGY LEVEL 0 STANDARD ACADEMY CHECKSHEET
02. HCOPL  7 FEB 65 reiss. 15 JUN 70 Keeping Scientology Working
03. HCOPL 17 JUN 70 Technical Degrades
04. HCOB  11 JUN 64 New Student Data
05. HCOB  25 JUN 71R rev. 25 NOV 74 Barriers To Study
06. HCOPL 31 MAY 68 Auditors
07. BPL   17 MAY 71RA r.13 NOV 72 r.10 JUN 74 Study Points and Conditions
08. HCOPL 27 MAY 65 Processing

part 2

09. HCOPL 15 DEC 65 Student's Guide To Acceptable Behavior
10. HCOPL 14 FEB 65 Safeguarding Technology
11. HCOB  27 SEP 66 The Anti-Social Personality
12. HCOPL 22 NOV 67 Rev. 18 JUL 70 Out Tech
13. HCOPL  8 JUN 70 Student Auditing
14. BPL   25 JUN 70RA Expanded Lower Grades
15. HCOB  25 SEP 71RA rev 4 APR 74 Tone Scale In Full
16. BTB   20 JUL 74 Basic Auditing Drills
17. HCOPL 14 OCT 68R rev 1 JAN 76 The Auditor's Code

part 3

18. BTB    6 NOV 72R rev 25 JUL 74 Admin 14R The Worksheets
19. BTB    6 NOV 72R rev 27 AUG 74 Admin 13R The Auditor Report Form
20. BTB    6 NOV 72R rev 28 JUL 74 Admin 12R The Summary Report Form
21. BTB   20 JUN 70 reiss 21 JUL 74 Summary Report
22. BTB    6 NOV 72RA rev 20 NOV 74 Admin 11RA The Exam Report
23. HCOPL  8 MAR 71 Examiner's Form
24. BTB    5 NOV 72R rev 9 SEP 74 Admin 7R The Folder Summary
25. BTB   24 APR 69R rev 8 SEP 74 Preclear Assessment Sheet
26. HCOPL 23 APR 68 Parent or Guardian Assent Forms
27. HCOB  16 AUG 71 Training Drills Modernized

part 4

28. HCOB  24 OCT 71 False TA
29. HCOB  24 OCT 71 False TA Addition 
30. HCOB  15 FEB 72 False TA Addition 2
31. HCOB  18 FEB 72 False TA Addition 3
32. HCOB  29 FEB 72R rev 23 NOV 73 False TA Checklist
33. HCOB  23 NOV 73 Dry and Wet Hands Make False TA
34. HCOB  21 OCT 68 Floating Needle
35. HCOB  11 FEB 66 Free Needles, How To Get Them On a PC
36. HCOB  21 SEP 66 ARC Break Needle
37. HCOB  20 FEB 70 Floating Needles and End Phenomena
38. HCOB   8 OCT 70 C/S Ser 20 Persistent F/N
39. HCOB  21 MAR 74 End Phenomena
40. HCOB  14 MAR 71R r. 25 JUL 73 F/N Everything
41. HCOB  14 OCT 68 Meter Position
42. BTB   14 JAN 63 Rings Causing "Rock Slams"
43. HCOB  18 MAR 74 E-Meter Sensitivity Errors
44. BTB   16 JUN 71R r. 22 JUL 74 Advanced E-Meter Drills
45. HCOB  11 MAY 69 Meter Trim Check
46. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 11 Metering
47. HCOB  10 DEC 65 E-Meter Drill Coaching

part 5

48. HCOB   7 APR 64 Q And A
49. HCOB   3 AUG 65 Auditing Goofs Blowdown Interruption
50. HCOB   5 FEB 66 Letting The PC Itsa
51. HCOB   7 MAY 69 The Five GAEs
52. HCOB  17 MAY 69 TRs and Dirty Needles
53. BTB    4 JUL 69 r. 6 JUL 74 Auditing of OT 3 Preclears
54. BTB   17 JUL 69 r. 28 JUN 74 Flagrant Auditing Errors
55. HCOB  29 JUL 64 Good Indicators At Lower Levels
56. BTB   26 APR 69 r. 7 JUL 64 Bad Indicators
57. HCOPL  4 APR 72 rev. 7 APR 72 Ethics And Study Tech
58. HCOB  14 NOV 65 Clearing Commands
59. BTB    2 MAY 72R r. 10 JUN 74 Clearing Commands
60. BTB   18 NOV 68R r. 9 JUN 74 Model Session
61. HCOB  12 AUG 69 Flying Ruds
62. HCOB  23 AUG 71 (24 May 70 rev) Auditors Rights
63. HCOB   6 NOV 64 Styles of Auditing

part 6

64. HCOB  30 APR 71 Auditing Comm Cycle
65. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 2R The Two Parts Of Auditing
66. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 3 Three Important Comm Lines
67. HCOB  23 MAY 71R aud ser 4R Comm Cycles Within the Auditing Cycle
68. HCOB  23 MAY 71R aud ser 5R The Comm Cycles In Auditing

part 7

69. HCOB  12 JAN 59 Tone of Voice - Acknowledgement
70. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 6 Auditor Failure To Understand
71. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 7 Premature Acknowledgements
72. HCOPL  1 JUL 65 Comm Cycle Additives
73. HCOB  29 SEP 65 Cyclical and Non-Cyclical Processes
74. HCOB  17 MAR 74 TWC, Using Wrong Questions
75. BOOK  Dianetics 55 Chapter 12 The 6 Basic Processes

part 8

76. HCOB  16 FEB 59 Staff Auditor's Conference

part 9

77. HCOB  20 OCT 59 An Experimental Process
78. HCOB  16 FEB 59 HGC Processes for those trained in Engram Running
79. HCOB   8 APR 58 A Pair Of Processes
80. HCOB   9 MAR 60 Expansion of OT-3A Procedure, Step Two
81. HCOB  20 APR 60 Processes
82. HCOB  27 SEP 68 ARC Straight Wire
83. BTB    9 OCT 71RA r. 28 JUN 74 ARC Straightwire Drills
84. BTB   15 NOV 76 ARC Straightwire Quads
85. BOOK  Creation of Human Ability R2-31
86. PAB    8 JUL 55 PAB 56 Axiom 51 and Comm Processing

part 10

87. PAB   18 JUN 55 PAB 54 Reality Level of Preclear
88. HCOB  17 MAR 60 Standardized Sessions
89. HCOB   4 MAY 59 An Affinity Process
90. HCOB   2 MAR 61 New Pre-Hav Command
91. HCOB  25 SEP 59 HAS Co-Audit
92. HCOB  21 JUL 59 HGC Allowed Processes
93. BOOK   Creation of Human Ability R2-60
94. HCOB  13 OCT 59 D.E.I. Expanded Scale
95. HCOB   7 MAY 59 New Process Theory
96. BOOK   Scn 8-8008 6 Levels of Processing Issue 5
97. HCOB  11 DEC 64 Scientology 0 Processes
98. HCOB  26 DEC 64 Routine 0-A Expanded

part 11

99. BTB    9 OCT 71RA r. 29 JUL 74 Level 0 Drills
100. BTB  15 NOV 76 Grade Zero Processes - Quads

********

69. HCOB  12 JAN 59 Tone of Voice - Acknowledgement


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
WASHINGTON, D.C.

HCO BULLETIN OF 12 JANUARY 1959

D of T
Acad Admin
Ext Course Dir 
Acad Insts
D of P
Processing Admin
HCO Bd of Renew
ACC World Wide Inst
HCO


TONE OF VOICE - ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Mood can be expressed by an acknowledgement. Evaluation can
also be accomplished by acknowledgement, depending on the
tone of voice with which it is uttered.

There is nothing bad about expressing mood by acknowledgement, 
except when the acknowledgement expresses criticalness, 
ridicule, or humor.

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH:-jh 
Copyright c 1959
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

********

70. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 6 Auditor Failure To Understand


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 23 MAY 1971
Issue VI

Remimeo
Auditors
Supervisors
Students 
Tech & Qual

HCOB of 17 Oct 1962, Reissued verbatim as
Basic Auditing Series 6


AUDITOR FAILURE TO UNDERSTAND

If a pc says something and the auditor fails to understand
what the pc said or meant, the correct response is:

"I did not (hear you) (understand what was said) (get that last)."

To do anything else is not only bad form, it can amount to
a heavy ARC Break.


INVALIDATION

To say "You did not speak loud enough____" or any other use
of "you" is an invalidation.

The pc is also thrown out of session by having
responsibility hung on him or her.

The Auditor is responsible for the session. Therefore the
auditor has to assume responsibility for all comm
breakdowns in it.


EVALUATION

Far more serious than Invalidation above, is the accidental
evaluation which may occur when the auditor repeats what
the pc said.

NEVER repeat anything a pc says after him, no matter why.

Repeating not only does not show the pc you heard but makes
him feel you're a circuit.

The highest advance of 19th Century Psychology was a
machine to drive people crazy.

All it did was repeat after the person everything the person said.

Children also do this to annoy.

But that isn't the main reason you do not repeat what the
pc said after the pc. If you say it wrong the pc is thrown
into heavy protest. The pc must correct the wrongness and
hangs up right there. It may take an hour to dig the pc out
of it.

Further, don't gesture to find out. To say, pointing, "You
mean this item, then," is not only an evaluation but a
nearly hypnotic command, and the pc feels he must reject
very strongly.

Don't tell the pc what the pc said and don't gesture to
find what the pc meant.

Just get the pc to say it again or get the pc to point it
out again. That's the correct action.


DRIVING IN ANCHOR POINTS

Also, do not shove things at a pc or throw things to a pc.
Don't gesture toward a pc. It drives in anchor points and
makes the pc reject the auditor.


ROCK SLAMMER

The reason a person who Rock Slams on Scientology or
auditors or the like can't audit well is that they are wary
of a pc and feel they must repeat after the pc, correct the
pc or gesture toward the pc.

But Rock Slammer or not, any new auditor may fall into
these bad habits and they should be broken fast.


SUMMARY

A very high percentage of ARC Breaks occur because of a
failure to understand the pc.

Don't prove you didn't with gestures or erroneous repeats.

Just audit, please.


L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:nt.rd
Copyright c 1962, 1971

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED


********

71. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 7 Premature Acknowledgements


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 23 MAY 1971

HCOB of 7 Apr AD15, Reissued verbatim as
Basic Auditing Series 7

Issue VII
Remimeo
Supervisors 
Students
Tech & Qual


PREMATURE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Here's a new discovery. Imagine my making one on the Comm
Formula after all these years.

Do people ever explain to you long after you have understood?

Do people get cross with you when they are trying to tell
you something? If so, you are suffering from Premature
Acknowledgement.

Like body odor and bad breath, it is not conducive to
social happiness. But you don't use Lifebuoy soap or
Listerine to cure it, you use a proper comm formula.

When you "coax" a person to talk after he has begun with a
nod or a low "yes" you ack, make him forget, then make him
believe you haven't got it and then make him tell you at
GREAT length. He feels bad and doesn't cognite and may ARC
Break.

Try it out. Have somebody tell you about something and then
encourage before he has completely told you all.

THAT'S why pcs Itsa on and on and on and on with no gain.
The auditor prematurely acknowledged. THAT'S why pcs get
cross "for no reason". The auditor has prematurely and
unwittingly acknowledged. THAT'S why one feels dull when
talking to certain people. They prematurely acknowledge.
That's why one thinks another is stupidthat person
prematurely acknowledges.

The quickest way to become a social pariah (dog) is to
prematurely acknowledge. One can do it in many ways.

The quickest way to start the longest conversation is to
prematurely acknowledge for the person believes he has not
been understood and so begins to explain at greater and
greater length.

So this was the hidden ARC Break maker, the cognition
wrecker, the stupidifier, the Itsa prolonger in sessions.

And why some people believe others are stupid or don't understand.

Any habit of agreeable noises and nods can be mistaken for
acknowledgement, ends cycle on the speaker, causes him to
forget, feel dull, believe the listener is stupid, get
cross, get exhausted explaining and ARC Break. The missed
withhold is inadvertent. One didn't get a chance to say
what one was going to say because one was stopped by
premature acknowledgement. Result, missed w/h in the
speaker, with all its consequences.

This can be counted on to make you feel frightened of being
"agreeable with noises or gestures" for a bit and then
you'll get it straight.

What a piece of tech to remain incompletely explained. Fair
scares one it does. And in the Comm Formula too!

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH nt.rd 
Copyright c 1965, 1971 
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED


********

72. HCOPL  1 JUL 65 Comm Cycle Additives


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO POLICY LETTER OF 1 JULY 1965
Issue II

Remimeo
Tech Hats HCO Division
Qual Hats Tech Div
Qual Div


COMM CYCLE ADDITIVES


There are no additives permitted on the Auditing Comm Cycle.

Example: Getting the pc to state the problem after the pc
has said what the problem is.

Example: Asking a pc if that is the answer.

Example: Telling pc "it didn't react" on the meter.

Example: Querying the answer.

This is the WORST kind of auditing.

Processes run best MUZZLED. By muzzled is meant using ONLY
TR 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 by the text.

A pc's results will go to HELL on an additive comm cycle.

There are a hundred thousand tricks that could be added to
the Auditing Comm Cycle.

EVERY ONE of them is a GOOF.

The ONLY time you ever ask for a repeat is when you
couldn't hear it.

Since 1950, I've known that all auditors talk too much in a
session. The maximum talk is the standard model session and
the TR 0 to 4 Auditing Comm Cycle ONLY.

It is a serious matter to get a pc to "clarify his answer".
It is in fact an Ethics matter and if done habitually is a
Suppressive Act, for it will wipe out all gains. There are
mannerism additives also.

Example: Waiting for the pc to look at you before you give
the next command. (Pcs who won't look at you are ARC
Broken. You don't then twist this to mean the pc has to
look at you before you give the next command.)

Example: A lifted eyebrow at an answer.

Example: A questioning sort of ack.

The Whole Message is

GOOD AUDITING OCCURS WHEN THE COMM CYCLE ALONE IS USED AND IS
MUZZLED.

Additives on the Auditing Comm Cycle are ANY ACTION,
STATEMENT, QUESTION OR EXPRESSION GIVEN IN ADDITION TO 
TRs 0-4.

They are Gross Auditing Errors. And should be regarded as such.

Auditors who add to the Auditing Comm Cycle never make
Releases. So, that's Suppressive.

Don't do it!


L. RON HUBBARD

LRH:ml.cden 
Copyright c 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED


********

73. HCOB  29 SEP 65 Cyclical and Non-Cyclical Processes


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 29 SEPTEMBER 1965

Remimeo
All Students
Saint Hill Courses
All staff


CYCLICAL AND NON-CYCLICAL PROCESS

CONCLUSIONS

A Non-Cyclical Process (i.e. a repetitive process which
does not cause the preclear to cycle on the Time Track) is
concluded precisely as stated in HCO Bulletin 3 July 1 965.

A Cyclic Processa repetitive process which does cause the
preclear to cycle on the Time Track as in Recall type
processesmust be concluded in Model Session as follows
"Where are you now on the Time Track?"

"I will continue this process until you are close to
present time." (After each command ask "When?") When the pc
is in PT, "That was the body of the session."

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH: ml.rd
Copyright c 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED


********

74. HCOB  17 MAR 74 TWC, Using Wrong Questions

[Ed Note: The following was omitted from the 1976 pack but is
in the 1974 pack.  It is referenced on the checksheet]


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
    Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 17 MARCH 1974
Remimeo
TWC CHECKSHEETS
   TWC, USING WRONG QUESTIONS

Two Way Comm is not an art. It is a science which has exact rules.

Foremost in the rules is:

DON'T USE A LISTING QUESTION IN TWO WAY COMM.

By a "listing question" is meant any question which directly or
indirectly calls for items in the Pc's answer.

Use of "who", "what", "which" instantly turns a TWC into a listing
question.

Listing questions are governed by the rules of Listing and Nulling.

If you use a listing question accidentally in TWC you can get the same bad
reactions from a pc that you would get on a wrongly done list.

The reason for pc upsets in TWC is hidden as it is not apparently a
listing process, rarely gets the correction a bad list would get.

Asking "who" or "what" or "which" during a TWC after the main question can
also turn it into a Listing and Nulling process.

TWC questions MUST be limited to feelings, reactions, significances. They
must NEVER ask for terminals or locations.

EXAMPLE: "Who upset you?" in TWC causes the pc to give items. This is a
LIST. "What are you upset about?" does the same thing. "Which town were you
happiest in?" is also a LISTING question NOT a TWC question. Any of these
results in the pc giving items. They are not then nulled or correctly
indicated. The pc can get VERY upset just as he would with a wrong list. Yet
the session is not a "listing session" so never gets corrected.

EXAMPLE:  "How are you doing lately?" is an example of a correct TWC
question. It gets off charge and gets no list items. "Are you better these
days than you used to be?" "How have you been since the last session?"

"What happened" is different than "What illness", "What person", "What
town" which are listing questions.

REPAIR

When other things fail to locate the upset of a pc look into TWC
processes in the folder and treat them as L&N processes where the pc has
answered with items. The relief is magical.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH: ntm.rd
Copyright $c 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

********

75. BOOK  Dianetics 55 Chapter 12 The 6 Basic Processes


CHAPTER XII

THE SIX BASIC PROCESSES

Exerpt from the Book: Dianetics 55!

Today's auditor must be conversant with six Basic Processes
and must be able to get results with these processes before
he can expect to get results with higher levels of auditing.

These six processes form a roadway for more than the
auditor. We discover that they compose a tone-scale. This
tone-scale is as follows: at its lowest and highest
reaches, whether by mimicry, words, or mock-up, we have
two-way communication. Next above this, occupying a
position from about 1.1 to 1.8 on the Chart of Human
Evaluation as given in "Science of Survival," we have
Elementary Straightwire. Above this we have, from 1.8 to
2.5, Opening Procedure. Above this, from 2.6 to 3.0, we
have Opening Procedure by Duplication.

Above this we have Remedy of Havingness, from 3.1 to 3.5,
and above this, from 3.6 to 4.0, Spotting Spots in Space.

An auditor, in auditing these six basic processes, becomes
sufficiently capable in observing and communicating that he
can handle (or, can bring the preclear up to the point
where he can handle) the "subjective process" which
remedies communication, or the other one which is the
"One-Shot Clear."

The problem of psychosis never rightly belonged in
Dianetics but it has been solved there. Opening Procedure
of 8-C and the Mimicry techniques as given in the PABs
resolve psychosis. They resolve it rapidly and care for it
adequately, and we have no real worry on that score. The
only reason we would enter the field of psychosis at all
would be to find out how far South our techniques worked.

CHART OF PROCESSES

WHERE THEY ARE ON THE ARC TONE SCALE

Exteriorized

4.0

Spotting Spots in Space

3.6

3.5

Remedy of Havingness

3.1

3.0

Op. Pro. by Duplication

2.6

2.5

Opening Procedure 8-C

1.8

1.8

Elementary Straightwire

1.1

1.0

Two-Way Communication

-8.0

As covered much more fully in "The Creation of Human
Ability," available from the Hubbard Scientology
Organization, these Six Basic Processes form the background
to all processes. Through them we find two-way
communication everywhere. It can be said with honesty that
there is no auditing without two-way communication.

The process, Two-way Communication itself, could be
subdivided into verbal and non-verbal processes. The verbal
processes would include questions about the present time
environment and the preclear's life, interests, and so
forth, and would get a direct answer to every question, no
matter how long the communication lag was. In other words,
a two-way communication would be entered upon so as to
actually bring the preclear to talk to the auditor.

In the case of people who have great difficulties in this
line, we have non-verbal techniques such as Mimicry,
wherein the auditor mimics the preclear and persuades the
preclear to mimic the auditor. Various processes are used,
such as passing a ball back and forth between them,
nodding, shaking hands, sitting down, standing up, walking
across the room and back and sitting down, all of which are
effective.

Much of this book, "Dianetics 55!" is on the subject of
two-way communication, and the totality of auditing is
bringing a preclear into excellent two-way communication,
and it is conceived a little difficult by instructors to
relay the "process" called Two-way Communication.

However, it is actually simplicity itself, for all that is
necessary is to get the preclear to actually volunteer
communication and answer the communications volunteered to
him. There is always something the preclear will talk about.

Mimicry, particularly when used on psychotics, is a
precision subject. Mimicry is not a new process, it is
almost as old as psycho-therapy, but it is spotty when used
without an intimate knowledge of validation. It can be said
that that which one validates comes true. The only force or
strength Life has is that which derives directly from the
upper echelon of Understanding. When Life gets down to a
point where it is incomprehensible it cannot relay any
understanding.Understanding this is essential for an
auditor. He must realize that he gives power to everything
he validates. We made some thing important out of the
engram, and by validating engrams, we actually, where they
were audited poorly, gave force and power to engrams. Thus
it is with the psychotic. To mimic the strange, peculiar,
bizarre and unusual things he does is to give force and
strength to those things. It cannot be said with sufficient
emphasis that the auditor must never mimic the strange,
bizarre and unusual manifestations of the psychotic. The
only way that the auditor can make mimicry work
consistently and continually and rapidly, is by validating
what the environment considers the agreed-upon, the usual,
the routine, the ordinary. Perhaps the psychotic is
twisting his hands madly, and occasionally nodding
slightly. The auditor, to mimic him, would not twist his
hands, but would nod slightly, since a nod is the
agreed-upon manifestation in the environment, not the
twisting of hands. If the auditor does this, the preclear
will begin to nod more and twist his hands less. If the
auditor were to begin to mimic the psychotic by twisting
hands, he would discover that the psychotic would probably
stop twisting his hands, but would do something else more
bizarre. And if the auditor mimics this much more bizarre
thing, the psychotic will simply go on to something even
wilder or might become entirely motionless, for the one
fear the psychotic has is becoming predictable. The
psychotic is under the control of entities, demon-circuits.
He does have a grain of sanity present, otherwise he would
not be able to function at all. Therefore, those things
which he does which are sane must be mimicked and so
reinforced. If an auditor knows this thoroughly and
practices it smartly he will discover that psychotics can
be brought into two-way communication and moved immediately
into Opening Procedure of 8-C, the proper process for
psychotics. 8-C, while not a psychotic process, does work
on psychotics. However, in working Opening Procedure of 8-C
on the psychotic, the auditor must be very careful not to
go beyond part "a" for a long, long time.

From the process known as "Two-way Communication" we move
on to the process known as "Elementary Straightwire."
Elementary Straightwire has two basic commands. One of
these commands is used continually, over, and over, and
over, and over, until the communication lag is entirely
flat on it and then the other command is used over, and
over, and over until the communication lag is entirely
flat, at which time it will be discovered that the first
command will now give communication lag. And so it is used
over, and over, and over, and then the second one is used
over, and over, and over. In other words, what we do here
is to use this process of Elementary Straightwire with just
two commands, continually, one command at a time,
flattening each communication lag encountered. While one is
doing this, of course, one maintains two-way communication.
He acknowledges the fact that the preclear has recalled
something and is in general alert to receive from the
preclear an originated communication, answer it, and give
further orders. The two commands of Elementary Straightwire
are: "Give me something you wouldn't mind remembering,"
"Give me something you wouldn't mind forgetting." This can
be varied with: "Tell me something you wouldn't mind
remembering," "Tell me something you wouldn't mind
forgetting." This Elementary Straightwire is a standard
form. If it is varied it should be varied towards
simplicity. A simple form of straightwire is "Remember
something," over and over, again, and again, and again, and
again, and again. Do not use, however, "Forget something,"
since this is far too rough for the preclear. Another even
simpler form is to apply "Remember something" to the
Dynamics, such as "Remember a man," "Remember a group." The
only error that can be made in Elementary Straightwire is
to get too fancy, for one does not believe that an auditor
who has advanced this far in auditing would make an error
in communication. There is an entire gamut which we call
"The next to the last list in Self-Analysis" published in
the original edition of "Self-Analysis" which has many
times been known to break a person from a neurotic to a
sane state. This is: "Can you recall a time that is really
real to you?" "Can you recall a time when you were
communicating well to someone?" "Can you recall a time when
someone was communicating well to you?" "Can you recall a
time when you felt Affinity for someone?" "Can you recall a
time when someone felt Affinity for you?" By keeping this
in the Understanding or Affinity line a case advances more
rapidly than if mis-emotion and other factors are addressed.

Opening Procedure of 8-C is one of the most effective and
powerful processes ever developed and should be recognized
and used as such. The main error which is made in the
Opening Procedure of 8-C is not to do it long enough. It
takes about 15 hours of Opening Procedure of 8-C in order
to bring a person into a completely relaxed and
Self-Determined state of mind regarding orders. Opening
Procedure of 8-C is a precision process. Step "a" of
Opening Procedure of 8-C is "Do you see that object?" the
auditor pointing. When the preclear signifies that he does,
the auditor says, "Walk over to it." When the preclear has
walked over to it, the auditor says, "Touch it." When the
preclear does, the auditor says, "Let go," and designates
another object -- a wall, a lamp -- calls it by name or
not, and goes through the same procedure once more. It is
important that the auditor specifically acknowledge each
time the preclear has executed the command given. When the
preclear has seen the object, when he has walked over to
it, when he has touched it, when he has let go -- each time
the auditor signifies that he has perceived and does
acknowledge this action on the part of the preclear. This
Step "a" is used until the preclear does it easily,
smoothly, without the slightest variation or introduction
of any physical communication lag, and has demonstrated
completely that he has no upset feeling about the auditor
or objects in the room.

When "a" has been run for a length of time necessary to
bring the case up tone, Part "b" is run. Part "b"
introduces the idea of decision. It is notable that the
"One-Shot Clear" must be very strong on this power of
decision. It is also notable that a person in extremely bad
condition has no power of decision. The commands of Part
"b" are: "Pick a spot in this room," and when the preclear
has: "Walk over to it," and when the preclear does: "Put
your finger on it," and when the preclear has: "Let go."
Each time, the auditor acknowledges the completion of the
command by the preclear, signifying "All right," "O.K.," or
"Fine," making it very plain that he has noticed and
approves of and is acknowledging the preclear in following
each specific command. He approves of these one at a time
in this fashion. The preclear is run on this until 
he demonstrates no physical communication lag of
any kind in making up his mind what to touch, how to touch
it, and so forth.

Part "c" of Opening Procedure of 8-C introduces further
decision. It goes as follows: the auditor says, "Pick a
spot in this room," and when the preclear has, the auditor
says "Walk over to it." When the preclear does, the auditor
says, "Make up your mind when you are going to place your
finger on it, and do so." When the preclear has, the
auditor says, "Make up your mind when you are going to let
go, and let go." The auditor each time acknowledges the
completion of one of these orders to the preclear.

In doing Opening Procedure of 8-C the preclear must not be
permitted to execute a command before it is given, and a
two-way communication must be maintained. As I have said,
Opening Procedure of 8-C is a very powerful process. If all
auditors knew how to do this Opening Procedure of 8-C and
could do this very well, we would right there have
psycho-therapy licked. But we are not trying to lick
psycho-therapy. It has never been a major problem to us. We
are trying to bring people a long way further North than
psycho-therapy ever dreamed of, and Dianetics and
Scientology are not psycho-therapies, they are processes
which increase the abilities of people.

Opening Procedure by Duplication has as its goal the
separating of time, moment from moment. This is done by
getting a preclear to duplicate the same action over and
over again with two dissimilar objects. In England this
process is called "Book and Bottle," probably because these
two familiar objects are the most used in doing Opening
Procedure by Duplication.

The first step in Opening Procedure by Duplication is to
familiarize the preclear with beth objects, as to their
reality and his ability to own them. One makes himself
handle them, and feel them, and acquaint himself with them,
makes him describe them as objects he is experiencing in
present time, not as something related into the past. A
little time spent on this can be quite beneficial.

The auditor then begins what will become to the preclear
before he is through with this some of the most hated
phrases anyone could conceive, but which, by the time the
preclear is finished with this, become just like any other
phrases. Many people believe that opening Procedure by
Duplication induces hypnosis. This is because in running it
hypnotism runs off: the preclear, while the hypnotism is
running off, may feel quite hypnotized. It is the exact
reverse of hypnotism. Hypnotism is an effort to persuade
the individual to do nothing, to sit still, and to accept
fully the inflow. Opening Procedure by Duplication contains
two-way communication, and indeed does not work unless
two-way communication is done with it. The main liability
in doing two-way communication on Opening Procedure by
Duplication is that the auditor, in introducing two-way
communication to it, may stray considerably from the
pattern laid down. He must not do this. Although he is
maintaining two-way communication he must adhere very
sharply to the process. He can make the preclear tell more
about them, he can make the preclear describe various
things which are manifesting themselves to the preclear he
can be insistent the preclear really knows he has just
picked this up, but he must stay with this sequence of
auditing commands, and may not vary from them even vaguely.
He can interject other conversation, but not other auditing
commands, into Opening Procedure by Duplication.

The auditing commands are: "Do you see that book?" says the
auditor, pointing. When the preclear signifies that he has,
the auditor says, "Walk over to it." When the preclear
does, the auditor says, "Pick it up." When the preclear
does, the auditor says, "Look at it." When the preclear
does (usually he was looking at it but now looks at it more
closely) the auditor says, "Give me its color." When the
preclear does, the auditor says, "Give me its weight." When
the preclear does, the auditor says, "Give me its
temperature." When the preclear has, the auditor says, "Put
it back exactly as you found it." This action sequence
having been completed, the auditor points to the bottle.
"Do you see that bottle?" When the preclear does, the
auditor says, "Walk over to it." When the preclear does,
the auditor says, "Pick it up." When the preclear has, the
auditor says, "Look at it." When the preclear does, the
auditor says, "Give me its color." When the preclear has, 
the auditor says, "Give me its weight." When the 
preclear has, the auditor says, "Give me its temperature." 
When the preclear has, the auditor says, "Put it back 
exactly as you found it." Then the auditor says, pointing 
out the book, "Do you see that book?" and so on, back 
and forth, using this exact sequence of commands. 
The auditor can interject "Describe it more fully." 
The auditor can sometimes, but not oftener than
once every 15 minutes, point to the book, have the preclear
go through the full sequence with the book, and then point
to the book again, and have the preclear once more go
through the full sequence with the book. This will break
down the automatic machinery a preclear is bound to set up
to compensate for this process. We want to keep the
preclear doing it, not his machines. By asking the preclear
to describe the object, or describe its temperature more
fully in its proper sequence in these commands, machines
are also broken down and the alertness and the awareness of
the preclear is increased.

The auditor must not omit letting the preclear give him the
preclear's reaction. The preclear will pause, seem to be
confused. It is up to the auditor at that moment to say,
"What happened?" and to find out what happened, and then to
continue with the process, having acknowledged the
communication of the preclear. An auditor must never be
afraid to let a preclear emanate a communication, and an
auditor must never fail to acknowledge the completion of an
auditing action, no matter how minute.

The Remedy of Havingness is an extremely effective process
for it remedies the ability of the preclear to have or not
have at will. Sometimes auditors interpret this process as
inflow, only. That is because the physical universe is an
inflow universe, and it is all too easy for an auditor to
assign to auditing and all other actions inflow
characteristics only.

The modus operandi of the Remedy of Havingness is to have
the preclear mock up something, pull it in, or mock up
something and throw it away. It does not matter what you
have him mock up. The item can have significance or not as
the case may be. Preclears who are low in tone, if this is
run on them, have a tendency to make everything they mock
very significant. It is not the significance, it is the
mass that counts. However, to keep the preclear interested,
or to assist his mocking up, an auditor may designate
specific things, and does so.

It will be found that the acceptance level and expectance
level of the preclear very definitely monitor what he mocks
up, and what he can pull in and what he can throw away. As
covered in the Professional Auditor's Bulletins, acceptance
level processes can be combined with the Remedy of Havingness.

The commands of Remedy of Havingness are as follows: "Mock
up a (planet, man, brick)." "Make a copy of it." "Make a
copy of it." "Make a copy of it." And when the preclear has
from five to 15 copies, "Push them all together." "Now pull
them in on you." When the preclear has done this for some
time, the last command is varied by saying, "Throw them
away and have them disappear in the distance." In other
words, we have the preclear mock up something, and when he
has we have him make a copy of it, make another copy, and
another copy, and another copy, one at a time, push them
together and pull them in or throw them away.

We keep up this process for some time until we are very
certain that he can actually throw things away or pull them
in on himself at will. This is the Remedy of Havingness.

Remedy of Havingness does not mean stuffing the preclear
with energy. It means remedying his ability to have or not
have energy. Run with particular significances such as
money, women, et cetera, one could remedy specific
scarcities on the part of the preclear. But remember that
at first they may be so scarce that at first he may have to
waste a large quantity of them before he can have one.

On an awareness of awareness unit exteriorized we run
Remedy of Havingness, but a little differently. We say,
"Put up eight anchor points." We describe to him how we
want these put up. We want them put up in such a way as to
form the corners of a cube. In other words, these eight
anchor points are not put in a group in front of or behind
the preclear, they are to be distributed around him. 
When the preclear has done this we say, "Pull them into 
you." We keep this up for a long time.  We also have the 
preclear exteriorized mock up eight anchor points and 
send them away from him. A preclear exteriorized
can be very unhappy about his lack of havingness and this
last process is used to remedy this upset.

Remedy of Havingness is an exteriorization technique. If it
is run on an individual long enough, say eight or ten
hours, he will probably exteriorize at the end of that
time. If you kept on running it as an exteriorized process,
given in the second part above, he would then have his
visio clear up, and he would finally get into very
excellent condition. This is quite a process.

However, remember this process depends upon the preclear
following the auditor's orders.

Unless the auditor has guaranteed this by Opening Procedure
of 8-C and Opening Procedure by Duplication, the chances of
the preclear's actually following his orders (although
pretending to do so) are very slim. We discovered in
old-time Dianetics that the breakdown was in the preclear
failing to follow the auditor's orders. Preclears would
pretend to follow an auditor's orders but actually would not.

The process known as Spotting Spots in Space is not to be
attempted on somebody who is having a difficult time, and
when it is attempted it should be accompanied with Remedy
of Havingness. One makes a person spot spots in space for a
short time, then remedies Havingness, makes them spot spots
in space, then remedies Havingness, then spot spots in
space. These two processes, Remedying Havingness and Spot
Spots in Space actually belong together, however the
preclear eventually emerges up in a higher band where he
can spot spots in space without remedying Havingness.

The auditing commands are: "Spot a spot in the space of
this room." When the preclear has, the auditor says, "Spot
another spot," etc. When the preclear gets well into the
process in this fashion we say, "Spot a spot in the space
of this room." "Walk over to it," and when he has, "Put
your finger on it." When he does, "Let go."

The auditor should ask the preclear when he starts this
process if the spot has any mass, color, temperature, or
any other characteristics, or "How big is it?" The auditor
asks this to make sure that the preclear is actually
spotting a spot, a simple location, not a spot that has a
mass, temperature, or characteristics. A location is simply
a location, it does not have mass, it does not have color,
it does not have any temperature. When we ask the preclear
to spot a spot at first his spots are liable to have mass
and temperature. We do not object to this, we simply ask
him frequently, once we have discovered that his spots do
have this, how his spots are getting along, and we
remember, on such a preclear, that we must remedy havingness.

Eventually he will move out to a point where he is simply
spotting locations.

These are the Six Basic Processes that an auditor must
know. They are all of them very powerful processes, and
each and any one of them can accomplish the goals which
were envisioned in "Dianetics:The Modern Science of Mental
Health." The essence of these processes is to do them as
given, to do them "purely," all the while maintaining a
two-way communication with the preclear. Auditors get into
minor variations on this set of processes, but these
processes were evolved first in theory by myself, were
developed in practice by myself, and were then given to
many auditors to do, and many auditors were trained in
them, and then these processes were refined and inspected
until they represent a very broad agreement, and we have
found that these commands, as you have them here, are the
best commands which can be used in processing a preclear.
The failure of an auditor to duplicate, his unwillingness
to duplicate, his upset about duplication in general will
quite often lead him up the blind alley of varying a
process compulsively or obsessively. When he does he can
expect to lessen the results. Auditing today, by the
experience of a very large number of auditors, is a very
severe discipline on the individual. It is not an art, and
it never will be an art.

It is a precision science. In the old days, all this talk
about art and intuition and instinctiveness cost a lot of
preclears the benefit of auditing. Auditing in the long ago
was tremendously complicated but it was none the less
precise. Now that it is very simple it is still very precise.

Amongst these processes an understanding of communication
lag and Opening Procedure of 8-C were chose as the two
processes to be taught to a very large area which
contained a large number of auditors. This area had been
noteworthy, heretofore, for the strange results "obtained"
by auditors and the strange techniques which were used in
it. A couple of auditors were sent into this area to teach
everybody communication lag and Opening Procedure of 8-C.
Actually these two auditors were originally from this area.
They did so, and several lives have been reported saved to
date, and a great many cases have been salvaged, and the
entire science is looking up in that particular area simply
because the area was taught nothing but communication lag
and the Opening Procedure of 8-C and did nothing thereafter
but this. Out in the outskirts of this area a couple of
auditors varied Opening Procedure by Duplication and were
reported to be having very good luck with the variation,
but these two auditors were not part of the crew who were
taught Opening Procedure of 8-C and communication lag, and
the results they are obtaining are very junior to the
results obtained by their own fellows very close by.

It could be said that the only real danger in auditing was
failure. Auditing is the start, change and stop of
aberration, or the creation of ability. Today creation of
ability takes prominence to a point where aberration drops
out of sight and is forgotten. But the auditor who does not
obtain results is demonstrating to himself that he cannot
control human aberration and human ability, and a
demonstration of his failure to himself is sufficient to
make him slightly incapable in handling his own
difficulties. Thus it is a tremendously important thing
that we have processes which, when used exactly as given,
and used with skill, produce uniformly good results on
preclears. An auditor using these on preclears gets better,
and better, and better, and better even when he doesn't
have any auditing himself -- a thing which was not the
story in 1950. When you can control aberration in others,
when you can increase the ability of others, you certainly
do not worry about your own. An auditor who has consistent
failures will eventually drop back to self-auditing, but
these processes will cure even that. Self-auditing, of
course, is the manifestation of going around running
concepts or processes on one's self. One is doing this
because he has been made afraid, through his failure on
others, of his ability to control his own engrams,
facsimiles, thoughts and concepts, and he seeks to control
them through auditing. It is not necessary for an
individual to audit himself in order to control his own
machinery.

Before anyone should adventure in the direction of testing
the "One-Shot-Clear" or doing anything about exteriorizing
the awareness of awareness unit and so making a Clear, he
should be entirely conversant with these processes.
Actually, any of these processes run long enough would
probably result in an exteriorization. There are faster
ways to achieve an exteriorization than these processes,
but these processes are preliminary to them. The preclear
who cannot follow the auditor's orders will not sit there
and do a subjective -- which is to say, an out-of-sight, in
his own mind -- process without varying it. The trouble
with the preclear is that he cannot duplicate, he cannot
follow the orders of the auditor, and when the auditor
tells him to run a concept or a thought, the preclear
probably pays token nod to this and runs entirely something
else. A very close E-Meter review of a number of preclears
who were not advancing under "subjective processes"
disclosed that each and every one of them had never run
what the auditor told them to run. They were afraid of
obeying the auditor, they were afraid of what the auditor
was doing, they were afraid of his skill. Opening Procedure
of 8-C remedies this fear and brings the inability and
unwillingness of the preclear out into the open where it
belongs.

In Opening Procedure by Duplication we very often get a
preclear "blowing the session" where the auditor has run an
insufficient quantity of Opening Procedure of 8-C. When a
preclear "blows the session" on Opening Procedure by
Duplication, the auditor has missed.

He has not run enough Opening Procedure of 8-C. How much is
enough Opening Procedure of 8-C? Until the person is in
very good condition as homo sapiens.

Remember that whether the command is physical or mental,
the auditor must observe communication lag. In Opening
Procedure of 8-C he simply repeats the process command all
the way through, and then again, and again and again and in
such a way flattens any lag that shows up. He does not
repeat the command on which the preclear got the lag. It is
easier to do this way, it is a more orderly process when it
is done this way. By very close theory, the actual command
on which the preclear lagged should be repeated again, but
this is not done.

These are the six basic processes which we must know before
we can constitute ourselves auditors. These are the
processes which are getting results. These are the
processes which are making able men and able women.

These processes can be varied into specific uses where
ability is concerned. One of the uses of these, for
instance, would be to raise the ability of a pilot to fly a
plane, or a person to drive a car, simply by having him
approach, touch, and let go of various parts of the object
to be controlled. The exact procedure as given above of
Opening Procedure is run, except that the object to be
controlled is used. Typists have learned to type better,
people have learned to drive cars better, and many other
abilities have been recovered simply by running 8-C. One
could envision a pianist who was getting tired, run-down,
or upset by his music, coming into full awareness of it
once more simply by running 8-C on his instrument or
instruments.

If we wanted to increase the ability of a salesman, it
would only be necessary to run any of the above processes
in their proper position on the tone scale to increase his
ability. Abilities increase, in general, when these are run.

When does one run what process? One should have a copy of
the Chart of Human Evaluation from "Science of Survival"
and know that chart well in order to understand exactly
where one starts. In general practice, however, an auditor
simply starts with two-way communication, and when he is
getting answers to his questions and is taking rather
freely with his preclear he goes into Elementary
Straightwire, and from Elementary Straightwire he goes into
Opening Procedure of 8-C.

There is a variation on two-way communication. If you have
a difficulty in getting a preclear started in two-way
communication it is a very easy thing to get him talking on
problems, and from problems to run this one, "What problem
could you be to yourself?" "What problem could you be to
others?" running one and then the other each time until the
preclear understood he could be an infinity of problems.
Many people are so thoroughly scarce on problems that they
will not let any go until they know that they can create
problems for themselves. When a case is stalling, he is
generally finding it very hard to give up a pet problem
because he knows he can't have any more. Of course, all
this is basically situated on answers. He can't have any
answers so he has to have problems, then from problems he
finally gets to a point where he can't even have these.

Anyone desiring to be a good auditor should follow this
chapter very closely, should provide himself with a copy of
"The Creation of Human Ability," and should also procure
"Science of Survival" and study them. The best way to
become an auditor is to be trained as an auditor. We have
found this so much the case that while we offered an
examination to anyone who wished to take it to the grade of
Hubbard Certified Auditor, or Hubbard Dianetic Auditor, we
never expected them to pass it -- for they never had, even
though it was on the most simple elements as you see before
you. There is no substitute for good training.


******** 



